Because
humans require a means of intercourse to survive as a species and are known for
their proliferation, I agree with Monto's study. As a species we have always
been susceptible to lust, and although some people are not open about it,
copulation happens somewhere almost every second. That is not to say that its frequency
has increased over the years, but the way it transpires has changed. Information
pertaining to relationships and sexual affiliations has become much easier to
obtain, which may lead some to believe that coitus has become much easier to
obtain as well.
One
particular skill is crucial for a species to be considered successful. It needs
to be able to reproduce; moreover, it needs to reproduce effectively. Humankind
would not be as successful as it is now if our ancestors were less than willing
to copulate with one another. It is inscribed in our DNA and is a part of our
everyday lives. It has been and still is one of the most popular activities in
the world.
This fact in
itself is enough to convince me that sexual encounters haven't increased;
instead, they have evolved in the forms of language and description. There is
less dating among young people, even though sexually active juvenile adults are
more likely to divulge their affiliations with their recent partners than in the past. Young
people are also less likely to have a recurrent sexually partner, which might
lead one to assume that there is less commitment amid college students.
Overall, the
youth who participate in intercourse are more prone to publicizing it
afterward. Sex isn't more prominent in the younger generation when
compared to the generation that came before them. Unfortunately, the large emphasis
attributed toward sex may shape false perceptions about the amount of sexual activity among
college students.
No comments:
Post a Comment