The articles mentioned that studies
and surveys were conducted to show which contraceptive was more accepted by
parents and sexually active teenagers. Also, the findings explained which
method had more of an effect in controlling unintended pregnancy and sexual
diseases. Several reasons were mentioned as to why one method was chosen over
the other. In addition, clinicians gave advice on how to overcome concerns
towards any method.
There is a high number of sexually
active teenagers. Charles Bankhead wrote, “42% of adolescents...have engaged in
sexual intercourse.” Most use contraceptives, but it is the short-term methods
that are favored over the long-term. Milly Dawson’s article mentioned that
among parents involved in a phone survey about their opinions on the two
methods of contraceptives rated birth control pills and condoms the highest.
These are considered short-term methods; even teenagers had a similar
acceptance towards the two. Dawson’s article goes on to say that when parents
take their teenage daughters to health care visits, both are open to doctors
giving birth control pills and condoms as the main methods. Lauren Hartman, a
clinician, reasoned that parents are accepting of these practices because they
are aware that their daughter or son may be sexually active but resist
long-term methods because they may imply an ongoing sexual relationship.
Although short-term contraceptives
have a higher usage rate, studies found that unintended pregnancies and
sexually transmitted diseases were still high (Bankhead). These high
percentages were found among sexually active teenagers. There are several
reasons as to why short-term contraceptives and these unwanted health concerns
are linked. However, none of the articles go into detail about the connection.
It is an ironic situation but reasons were given as to why short term methods
had a higher acceptance over long-term. In the phone survey, implants and
intrauterine devices (IUDs) had the lowest acceptance rate ( Dawson). However,
these are considered the most effective contraceptives. Pregnancy rates were
less than 1% when females used a long-acting method (Bankhead). Members of the
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reasoned that parents are
misinformed about contraceptives such as IUDs and implants. Also, health costs
and risks were considered factors as to why long-term methods were avoided
(Bankhead). A board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist connected the concerns
of parents with the Dalkon Shield incident. Hartman suggested that clinicians
should do research on these methods and share that information with parents and
teenagers (Dawson).
No comments:
Post a Comment