According to a study in the Journal of Adolescent Health, parents are not willing to accept
their daughter being offered long acting contraceptive methods and are more
likely to accept short-term contraceptive methods. The study also affirms that
the reason for such a choice is that parents might associate long acting
contraception, such as IUDs, which has been proven to have a pregnancy rate of
less than 1%, with an ongoing sexual relationship. In other words, parents are
not comfortable with the possibility of their children having an ongoing but well
protected sexual relationship through IUDs. Yet, they are indirectly accepting
such a lifestyle with less effective contraceptive methods, which increases the
risks of sexually transmitted diseases and an unwanted pregnancy.
Indeed it is an infringement of teenagers’ rights to
interfere in their autonomy, but parents need at least to communicate to their
children information about the different types of contraceptive methods and about
the consequences which arise from the use of the short term ones. Bankhead
stated that more than 80% of teen pregnancies are unintended, reflecting high
rates of non-use, inconsistent use, and use of failure-prone contraceptive
methods. Short lasting contraceptive which are considered less effective than
IUDs, are in high demand by teenagers. The reason for that is mainly because
they don’t require permanent use, and they are easily accessible unlike
implants and intrauterine devices which are costly and hard to obtain.
In order to enforce the use of contraceptive
implants and intrauterine devices among teenagers nowadays, these methods
should be easily accessible. And, along with these methods, condoms should
consistently be used to protect against STDs, according to Bankhead.
No comments:
Post a Comment