Milly Dawson in her article
suggests that parents play a role in what contraceptive method their child will
use. Parents who respect their child’s autonomy will be comfortable with their
child getting contraceptives from a doctor. Dawson is encouraging the use of
long acting contraceptives such as the contraceptive implants and intrauterine
devices. She writes that ‘’effective methods are still under used’’ by
teenagers. She provides statistics on which contraceptive methods parents were
most comfortable with. In a survey, the birth control pills and condoms, which
she believes are not effective, had the most acceptance by parents whereas
implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs) where least accepted.
She assumed that parents may not
approve the use of ‘longer acting’ methods because they do not recognize ‘their
teens autonomy.’ Parents might associate long acting methods with ongoing
sexual relationships. The other reason maybe
that parents remember the Dalkon shield, an IUD which had considerable safety
problems. She concludes, however, that the risk of pregnancy outweighs that of
any contraceptive method.
The second article is in full
support of the use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices. They quote
the ACOG committee on adolescent health, who wrote, ‘’these contraceptive
methods have the highest rates of satisfaction and continuation.’’
The authors write that although
adolescents use contraception, they do not use the most effective types. The
high numbers of teenage pregnancies show that teens are not using
contraception, use contraception inconsistently, and some fail to use the
contraceptive correctly. Evidence also shows that women who use long acting
methods of contraception are more likely to continue using it for a year vs.
those who use short term contraception. The rate of unintended pregnancies is
also less in women who use long term contraceptives.
The article suggests that adolescents
should have easier access to long acting contraceptives. It also explains that
people may not be using long acting contraceptives because of misperceptions,
high cost, a lack of access and health care’s provider concerns about safety. A
study showed that without these barriers, most women would choose long acting
reversible contraceptives.
The writer suggests however; that
these non barrier methods should be used along with condoms to reduce risk of sexually
transmitted infections. They also suggest that teenagers should be referred to
public clinics. This will reduce cost and they will receive information,
recommendations, suggestions and counseling regarding use of long-acting
reversible contraceptives.